The UAP Phenomenon and Brazil
American authorities, such as Marco Rubio (current US Secretary of State), and intelligence officers openly discuss the existence of UFO retrieval programs. We analyze recent information (2025) and how the Varginha case connects to this global scenario of disclosure of secrets related to the topic.
Introduction
This space was born from genuine curiosity about current topics that, although fascinating, rarely find space in public debate or traditional media. My goal with this site is not casual entertainment, but rather to share reflections and discoveries about subjects that have intrigued me in recent years.
Although my professional work focuses on applied Artificial Intelligence research and technological innovation, I have dedicated part of my time to following what is happening behind the scenes of a topic that many still consider taboo: the UAP Phenomenon — a modern term for what we know as UFOs.
I know that dedicating attention to a long text requires interest and a gap in the schedule. However, if you can accompany me for a few minutes, I will try to show why I believe this subject deserves careful attention, beyond stigmas and science fiction. What definitively sparked my interest was noticing that high-ranking figures in the American government, such as the current Secretary of State and the National Security Advisor, are treating the topic with a seriousness that draws attention.
As this article is designed to be a multimedia experience, I will include direct video references throughout the text, allowing you to see and hear the sources that underpin this discussion.
Enable automatic captions (English), or choose the automatic translation option to your language in the YouTube player.
My intention is to organize selected and verified information to provide support to those who want to enter this debate with more clarity. It is curious to observe how new evidence suggests that the hypothesis of non-human intelligences may be real, no matter how absurd this sounded a short time ago. When we hear dozens of professionals with solid careers affirm that these phenomena are documented facts and monitored in real time, it is difficult to ignore the relevance of the topic.
Brazil, in fact, is at the center of several of these international events, although national coverage is still timid, possibly due to the strong stigma that still surrounds the subject.
The "Phenomenon"
To begin, it is worth clarifying what UAP means. The term "Unidentified Aerospace-Undersea Phenomena" is a modern nomenclature adopted to distance serious scientific research from the popular imagination of "flying saucers". This name change reflects a more technical and agnostic approach to the nature of these objects.
Unlike "extraterrestrial", the term NHI does not assume a specific origin. It admits the existence of an intelligence behind the phenomena, but leaves open whether it comes from another planet, another dimension, or something that our science cannot yet classify. Although I use the term "alien" occasionally to facilitate reading, the use of NHI is preferable when we want to maintain clarity and avoid hasty conclusions.
My journey in this terrain began by following certain public hearings in the American Senate in 2024. It was from these official testimonies that I realized that the topic was being addressed from a very different perspective than classic ufology, involving engineers, astrophysicists, and intelligence officers.
When researching more deeply, I noticed the difficulty of finding updated materials that meet more critical minds without falling into empty speculations. Although the volume of historical evidence is vast, the lack of forensic validation has always been an obstacle. However, this scenario has been changing rapidly, and I believe we already have enough material to start a qualified public debate in Brazil.
Our approach here will be to temporarily suspend prior beliefs and look critically at the facts, always maintaining a healthy dose of skepticism. We will focus on what we can infer as possible from the most solid recent information, without needing to believe or disbelieve. We just want to question ourselves.
"The Age of Disclosure"
In this section, we will analyze two documentaries released in late 2025 that brought light to facts previously restricted to closed circles. The first of these is "The Age of Disclosure", by producer Dan Farah.
It is in this documentary that Marco Rubio makes surprising statements. He suggests the existence of a decades-long effort — comparable in secrecy to the Manhattan Project — to research and simultaneously cover up information about events involving UAPs. According to Rubio, this system of secrets is so compartmentalized that not even directors of agencies like the CIA or DIA would have a complete view of the subject today, since they occupy transitional positions.
The real control would be at deeper hierarchical levels, where secret projects are exposed to tiny groups of people over decades. Each participant accesses only a small fragment of the technology, which prevents leaks and facilitates official denial of the programs.
The most relevant aspect of this documentary is bringing together 34 high-ranking voices speaking publicly about the topic for the first time. The official trailer offers a glimpse of these statements:
Jay Stratton (DIA and UAP Task Force)
One of the most impactful statements in the documentary comes from Jay Stratton, a retired senior officer of American military intelligence (DIA). Stratton does not speak as an enthusiast, but as someone who dedicated 16 years of his official career specifically to the UAP agenda.
He served as director of the "UAP Task Force", a task force created to standardize the analysis of reports and assess risks to national security. For Stratton, the question "are we alone?" ceased to be the focus long ago. His work consisted of understanding the capabilities and intentions of these phenomena. We are talking about a professional who operated at the heart of military intelligence, analyzing technical data and telemetry, not just anecdotal reports.
Luis Elizondo (AATIP, Pentagon)
Another central figure is Luis Elizondo, former director of the AATIP program at the Pentagon. Elizondo has been a fundamental articulator in the process of bringing these discussions to the public, despite the restrictions imposed by his secrecy agreements (NDAs).
He maintains that the US has long-standing programs aimed at recovering and reverse engineering technologies of non-human origin. As Rubio explained, the fact that this information is not publicly confirmed does not mean it does not exist; often, the military high command itself is kept in the dark by a deliberately fragmented secrecy system.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna
To reinforce this perception that something is being hidden, it is worth observing the work of Representative Anna Paulina Luna. She chairs the American Congress task force focused on declassifying federal secrets, with special attention to UAPs.
Luna reports that, in testimonies collected in secure locations authorized for sharing federal secrets (SCIFs), she heard physicists and other professionals who claim to have officially worked on reverse engineering projects of non-human technologies. The central point of her criticism is the barrier imposed by the intelligence community: although Congress has the constitutional power of oversight, access to official records on the topic is frequently blocked.
The question that she and other lawmakers ask is simple: if there is nothing to see, why deny access to the files? This institutional resistance only fuels curiosity and the need for transparency.
Recent visual evidence (Yemen, 2024)
To give visual weight to what congressmen discuss, a military video recorded in 2024 offers an intriguing example. Captured by an American drone in Yemen, the recording shows a UAP being hit by a Hellfire missile.
What is observed is the impact displacing the object, but without causing explosion or apparent damage. Then, parts seem to separate from the main object, but continue to follow it. What kind of technology or natural phenomenon would behave this way under the impact of a missile that doesn't even explode? This does not reach the public.
In addition to these visual evidences, the documentary "The Age of Disclosure" presents the perspective of physicists like Hal Puthoff and Eric Davis, who explore how these objects could apparently defy known laws of physics. Without violating their secrecy commitments, they offer scientific paths to understand behaviors that, at first glance, seem impossible.
SOL Foundation
Although the testimonies of officials are fascinating, the absence of public scientific evidence has always been a weak point in this debate. Fortunately, this scenario is changing with initiatives like the SOL Foundation, created in 2023 by Professor Garry Nolan of Stanford.
Nolan is a renowned researcher, with dozens of patents and founder of multiple biotechnology companies. The mission of the SOL Foundation is to support public research on UAPs and provide serious analyses for the government and society. An example of this scientific look at the topic can be seen in the lecture by astronomer Beatriz Villarroel, who investigates the existence of anomalous objects in Earth's orbit as early as the 1950s — before the launch of the first human artificial satellite, Sputnik.
If you want a small sample of this intersection of mainstream science with the UAP topic, see the lecture excerpts below.
Villarroel's research focuses on light patterns that do not behave like known natural astronomical phenomena. The fact that these records exist on photographic plates prior to the human space age is concrete data that challenges simple explanations and invites deep academic exploration.
Where are the material evidence?
A natural question in the face of all this is: if these ships and materials exist, why are they not presented to the public? The explanation offered by various whistleblowers points to a strategy of "outsourcing secrecy".
Many of these evidences would not be in government bases, but under the custody of private companies in the military and aerospace complex, such as Lockheed Martin. By transferring the material to the private sector, the government creates a layer of legal protection: when Congress requests information from the Department of Defense, it can respond, technically, that it does not have the files, as they belong to a subcontracted private entity.
If this "Legacy Crash-Retrieval" program is real, it would operate outside democratic oversight, using public resources in a compartmentalized manner. This would not just be a technological secret, but a matter of constitutional violation. And, as we will see, this dynamic of secret action seems not to be restricted to American territory, reaching Brazil as well.
What does the "UAP Disclosure" movement claim?
We obviously cannot be naive. A possible technology that can operate with energy levels capable of accelerating and decelerating, making 90-degree turns as if there were no inertia and presenting the type of performance observed would make the atomic bomb seem like a firecracker.
If true, it is easy to imagine how, from the American perspective, this type of research should be conducted with the highest possible levels of secrecy. However, from my perspective, just as nuclear research has a civilian branch separate from the military, intended for energy production and taught in universities, the same could be done regarding this topic, for the benefit of humanity.
We are talking about clean and inexhaustible energy and technological leaps that we cannot even imagine. In particular, I believe that "disclosure" should not be the result only of the revelation of military secrets, but also of the engagement of the scientific community in the study of these phenomena. No one can prevent this!
And, if it weren't enough to have nuclear missiles pointed at each other, what is being alleged is that there would be a cold war, a technological and arms race based on reverse engineering of supposedly alien ships occurring for decades.
UAP Disclosure in Brazil
The phenomenon of cover-up is not exclusive to America. In Brazil, we have emblematic cases that suggest a similar dynamic. A striking example is "Operation Saucer" (1977-1978), conducted by the Brazilian Air Force to investigate sightings that generated panic in the population of Belém and surroundings.
Captain Hollanda, who led the operation, became a whistleblower in 1997, offering details about what was observed. Tragically, he died shortly after under circumstances that many consider suspicious. Thanks to the effort of Brazilian researchers, official records of this operation were declassified and are now available in the National Archive, confirming that the mission actually occurred and documented anomalous phenomena.
An important milestone of transparency in Brazil is Ordinance No. 551/GC3 of 2010, which establishes rules for the registration and cataloging of UFOs within the Air Force Command. This shows that, institutionally, Brazil recognizes the need to document these events, although public debate remains limited.
The Varginha/MG Case (1996)
For many Brazilians, the "Varginha ET" is just part of our folklore or an urban legend from the 90s. I myself remember following the reports at the time and, like most, not taking the subject seriously. After all, without official recognition, it was difficult to believe in a story based only on reports from teenagers about a "being" in a vacant lot.
However, three decades later, the scenario has changed drastically. Recent investigations have transformed Varginha into the event with the largest amount of correlated public evidence in the world. What once seemed like an isolated story now connects to a complex network of witnesses — including military and health professionals — who describe an operation to capture and transport non-human beings.
Unlike Roswell, the Varginha case occurred in an urban area and more recently, which means that many eyewitnesses are alive and active. A notable example is the testimony of Dr. Ítalo Venturelli, a neurosurgeon who works at the hospital where one of the beings would have been taken.
The Varginha case is a key piece because it suggests the action of international crash-retrieval programs on Brazilian soil. There are consistent reports of American intervention and the transport of materials from Campinas airport, which reinforces the hypothesis of a technological and military cooperation (or subservience) that crosses borders.
French scientist Jacques Vallee, one of the most respected names in UAP research in the world, points out that the details described in Varginha are consistent with reports collected in other parts of the world by witnesses who have never had contact with each other. This convergence of data significantly increases the credibility of the case.
Conclusion and Reflections
If you have reached this point with a skeptical stance, you will probably continue so, but perhaps with new questions. Would it be possible to maintain a secret of this magnitude for 80 years? Would we be facing secret technologies from terrestrial powers or something truly beyond our current understanding?
Remaining skeptical but curious is the most productive attitude for navigating this topic. True skepticism is not blind denial, but the search for answers. What we propose here is to temporarily suspend ready conclusions and allow yourself to look at the evidence with intellectual honesty.
The hypothesis of non-human intelligences is no longer just a conspiracy theory; it is a possibility being discussed at the highest levels of government and science. If confirmed, it would require a profound update of our worldview and our understanding of reality.
Soon, we will explore the UAP phenomenon from a purely scientific perspective, analyzing how universities and research groups are beginning to treat the topic with the rigor it requires. Whatever the explanation, something strange seems to be happening indeed.
I invite you to continue following these reflections here on the site and to share your honest doubts and impressions in the comments.
Finally, I leave my recommendations for all the content briefly cited here. They are listed below, starting with the two documentaries.